Monsiegesocial Logo

EU AI Act for Belgian SMEs: application timeline explained

EU AI Act for Belgian SMEs: application timeline 2025-2028 after the Digital Omnibus, risk-based obligations and penalties, explained for small business owners.

L

L'équipe Monsiegesocial

Published on 20 octobre 20268 min read
Verified official sources
Legal documents and law books on a desk, symbolising the regulation that applies to businesses

Key takeaways

  • The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) entered into force on 1 August 2024 and applies in phases until 2028, not all at once.
  • The Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of 8 July 2026) postponed the deadlines for high-risk systems: December 2027 and August 2028 instead of 2026 and 2027.
  • The ban on certain practices and the AI literacy obligation already apply since 2 February 2025, regardless of company size.
  • Fines go up to 35 million euros or 7% of worldwide turnover, but an SME is sanctioned on the basis of the lower of the two caps.
  • The European Commission's official portal does not currently list any Belgian authority formally designated to enforce the AI Act, which does not suspend the obligations themselves.

Many Belgian SME owners believe the EU AI Act is a distant deadline, set for 2026 or 2027. In reality, part of its obligations has applied since February 2025, and the timeline for the remaining deadlines changed in July 2026 with the adoption of a corrective text. This article sets out the dates that actually matter today for a Belgian SME, the obligations that follow from them depending on the risk of the system used, and the penalties for non-compliance.

What the AI Act changes for Belgian SMEs

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, known as the AI Act, governs the placing on the market and use of artificial intelligence systems in the European Union. It entered into force on 1 August 2024, twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The text does not distinguish obligations by company size, but by the risk level of the AI system used or placed on the market. An SME that simply uses a consumer-facing AI tool (drafting, translation, document sorting) is subject to lighter obligations than a provider that develops or markets a system classified as high-risk, for example for recruitment or credit scoring.

AI Act application timeline: the key dates

The regulation does not apply all at once: its provisions take effect in successive blocks, spread over several years.

  1. 1

    Regulation enters into force

    1 August 2024

    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 enters into force, but most of its obligations are not yet applicable.

  2. 2

    Prohibited practices and AI literacy

    2 February 2025

    The prohibited AI practices (art. 5) and the staff AI literacy obligation (art. 4) become applicable.

  3. 3

    General-purpose AI models and governance

    2 August 2025

    The rules on general-purpose AI models, EU governance and the penalty regime (except one specific article) apply.

  4. 4

    Majority of provisions and SME measures

    2 August 2026

    Most of the remaining provisions apply, including the transparency obligations (art. 50) and the SME support measures (art. 62).

  5. 5

    Standalone high-risk systems (Annex III)

    2 December 2027

    Obligations for standalone high-risk systems (recruitment, credit, education...) apply, after the delay decided in 2026.

  6. 6

    Embedded high-risk systems (Annex I)

    2 August 2028

    Obligations for high-risk systems embedded in products already regulated (machinery, medical devices...) apply.

Which obligations apply depending on the AI system's risk level

The regulation classifies AI systems into four categories, with obligations proportionate to the risk they pose to fundamental rights or safety.

Risk levelExampleMain obligation
Unacceptable riskSocial scoring, behavioural manipulationOutright ban since 2 February 2025
High riskRecruitment, credit scoring, medical devicesRisk management, documentation, human oversight
Limited riskChatbot, AI-generated content, deepfakeTransparency obligation towards the user (art. 50)
Minimal riskSpam filter, AI-powered video gameNo specific obligation under the regulation
Simplified classification of the AI Act by system risk level.

Most tools used today by a Belgian SME (writing assistant, machine translation, support chatbot) fall under limited or minimal risk. A provider or deployer implementing a high-risk system, however, must meet heavier obligations of risk management, technical documentation and human oversight.

AI literacy and the penalties set out in the regulation

Article 4 of the regulation has required, since 2 February 2025, providers and professional users of an AI system to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff, meaning the ability to understand the possibilities, limits and risks of the tool used. This obligation is worded as binding, even though it does not appear in the list of breaches to which the regulation attaches a specific fine.

The penalty regime itself is precise, and has already been applicable since 2 August 2025 for most of its mechanisms.

35 M€ / 7%

prohibited practice

the higher of the two amounts, for a large company

15 M€ / 3%

other breaches

provider, deployer, transparency obligation

7.5 M€ / 1%

misleading information

given to an authority or a notified body

For an SME or a start-up, the regulation reverses the logic: the lower of the two caps (fixed amount or percentage of worldwide turnover) applies, not the higher one as for a large company.

Review your regulatory obligations

Monsiegesocial supports Belgian SME owners with company formation, business domiciliation and governance organisation in the face of new regulatory obligations.

Who enforces the AI Act in Belgium

The regulation requires each Member State to designate at least one notifying authority and one market surveillance authority, with published contact details (art. 70). As of the writing of this article, the European Commission's official AI Act portal does not list any Belgian authority formally designated for this purpose, and no text published in the Moniteur belge confirms such a designation.

In the absence of a confirmed designation, the FPS Economy plays a coordination and information role for businesses regarding the AI Act's obligations. This situation has no effect on the application of the obligations themselves: an SME remains bound to comply with them, regardless of how far the designation of the competent Belgian authority has progressed.

How a Belgian SME can prepare

Coming into compliance with the AI Act does not require, for the vast majority of SMEs, a heavy process. The points below cover the essentials of what is already required.

To check right now

  • List the AI tools used in the company

    Writing assistants, customer data processing tools, any recruitment or scoring solutions.

  • Rule out any prohibited practice

    Check that no tool falls under the practices prohibited since February 2025 (social scoring, behavioural manipulation, certain biometric uses).

  • Document an AI literacy approach

    Train staff who use AI tools on their limits and risks, and keep a record of this process.

  • Identify any potential high-risk system

    A recruitment or credit-scoring tool bought from a provider may fall under high risk; check its classification with the vendor.

  • Follow the SME support measures

    Article 62 provides priority access to regulatory sandboxes and reduced compliance fees for SMEs and start-ups.

For the compliance of data processed by these tools, GDPR remains fully applicable alongside the AI Act: the two texts apply together as soon as an AI tool processes personal data.

Going further

Frequently asked questions

When does the EU AI Act apply to Belgian SMEs?

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 entered into force on 1 August 2024 but applies in phases. The ban on certain practices and the AI literacy obligation have applied since 2 February 2025, the rules on general-purpose AI models and governance since 2 August 2025, and most of the remaining provisions since 2 August 2026. The obligations specific to high-risk systems follow an even later timeline.

Have the 2026 and 2027 dates for high-risk systems changed?

Yes. The regulation known as the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of 8 July 2026) postponed these deadlines: obligations for standalone high-risk systems under Annex III now apply from 2 December 2027, and those for high-risk systems embedded in products already regulated (Annex I) from 2 August 2028. Any source written before summer 2026 that still cites August 2026 or August 2027 for these categories is out of date.

What penalties does a Belgian SME risk for non-compliance with the AI Act?

The regulation sets out three tiers of administrative fine (art. 99): up to 35 million euros or 7% of worldwide turnover for a prohibited practice, up to 15 million euros or 3% for other breaches, and up to 7.5 million euros or 1% for misleading information given to the authorities. For an SME or a start-up, the lower of the two caps applies, not the higher one as for a large company.

Is the AI literacy obligation already binding?

Yes. Article 4 of the regulation has required, since 2 February 2025, providers and deployers of an AI system to ensure, to the best extent possible, a sufficient level of AI literacy among their staff. This obligation is worded as binding, even though it does not appear in the list of breaches sanctioned by a specific fine under Article 99.

Which authority enforces the AI Act in Belgium?

The regulation requires each Member State to designate at least one market surveillance authority and publish its contact details (art. 70). As of the writing of this article, the European Commission's official AI Act portal does not list any Belgian authority formally designated for this purpose. In the meantime, the FPS Economy plays a coordination and information role for businesses.

Does an SME benefit from specific measures under the AI Act?

Yes. Article 62 provides SMEs and start-ups with priority access to regulatory sandboxes on AI, awareness-raising and training activities tailored to their size, and conformity assessment fees reduced proportionately to their size.

You might also like